Rebekah Vardy ‘benefited financially after leaking stories about Coleen Rooney'

Rebekah Vardy benefited financially after leaking stories about Coleen Rooney to the paper, the High Court has heard in the latest instalment of the Wagatha Christie drama.

In October 2019 Rooney, 35, accused fellow WAG Vardy, 39, of leaking ‘false stories’ about her private life after carrying out a months-long ‘sting operation’ which received peak reaction from people on social media.

The wife of former England star Wayne Rooney claimed her fellow footballer’s wife shared fake stories she had deliberately posted on her personal Instagram account with the newspaper.

Name-dropping Vardy, Rooney then wrote on Instagram and Twitter: ‘For a few years now someone who I trusted to follow me on my personal Instagram account has been consistently informing The Sun newspaper of my private posts and stories.

‘I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person has viewed them. It’s………. Rebekah Vardy’s account.’

In the wake of the accusations, Vardy, who is married to Leicester City striker Jamie Vardy, vehemently denied the claims and is now suing Rooney for libel.

At a hearing on Friday, Vardy’s lawyers asked the High Court to throw out parts of Rooney’s defence, including allegations of Vardy’s close relationship with The Sun and benefits she received through positive coverage.

Representing Vardy, Hugh Tomlinson QC said sections of the defence around Vardy’s relationship with The Sun newspaper, including her alleged but denied authorship of The Secret Wag column, are not relevant to the trial.

He told the court: ‘Much of it is so far away from the issues as to be patently irrelevant,’ adding of her defence: ‘There was almost nothing about leaking private information about anyone to the press, let alone the defendant’s family and friends.’

Tomlinson highlighted that both women have a public profile and their own relationships with the media, saying: ‘What has happened in this case is that the defendant has gone through the claimant’s appearances in the newspapers, put two and two together and made seven.’

He also denied that Vardy wanted those parts of the defence thrown out because they would be embarrassing for her.

He added: ‘If necessary she will deal with it but we say it is not necessary and will be a waste of everybody’s time.’

The barrister argued that the central issue was whether Vardy was leaking posts from Rooney’s Instagram and that the other issues would not be necessary.

In his written submissions, Tomlinson said most of the claims made by Rooney’s lawyers were in dispute and denied.

He continued: ‘Even if it were established that the claimant has “an exceptionally close relationship” with The Sun, that it gave her positive coverage, that she has a history of self-promotion or is the “Secret Wag”, does not mean that it is more likely than not that the claimant had regularly informed The Sun about the defendant’s private posts.’

He added: ‘Most of the factual allegations which are made are, in fact, wrong, but considerable time and costs will be wasted in examining them… It will be a monumental waste of time and costs.’

The move to throw out part of the defence was opposed by Rooney, with her barrister David Sherborne arguing that the ‘exceptionally close relationship’ Vardy is said to have had with newspaper is a key part of the case.

In written submissions, Sherborne said Vardy had a ‘habitual practice’ of providing private information to the press to promote her profile.

He told the court: ‘The timing of positive coverage of the claimant in The Sun was strikingly close to the publication of other articles … that were leaked from the defendant’s private Instagram.

‘This supports the inference that the claimant was benefiting from the leak of private information about the defendant to the newspaper.’

Sherborne added that that Vardy used her close relationship with The Sun or its journalists ‘for the purposes of promoting or financially exploiting her public profile’.

The barrister later claimed that Vardy would receive a split of commission and revenue for stories given to The Sun through the Front Row Partnership, a PR agency where Vardy was a client.

Vardy has denied any knowledge or authorisation of passing on private information.

On Friday, the High Court also heard that mediation took place between the two WAGS, but was unsuccessful.

Dancing On Ice star Vardy has also applied for summary judgment – a legal step which would see that part of the case resolved without a trial – in relation to Rooney’s claim that she leaked a story to The Sun about her returning to TV presenting.

Rooney had said she blocked everyone except Vardy from seeing her Instagram stories between September 1 and October 4 2019 before posting a selfie with text reading ‘easing my way back into work!! TV decisions today’ on September 25.

A story reporting her desire to revive her TV career appeared on The Sun’s website three days later, it’s claimed.

However, Rooney said she ‘invented’ the story as part of her investigation to discover the source of the leaks and had no intention of entering into more television work.

Rooney has also said she planted stories about her travelling to Mexico to ‘see what this gender selection is all about’ and the basement flooding in her new house.

Vardy sued Rooney last June, claiming she ‘suffered extreme distress, hurt, anxiety and embarrassment as a result of the publication of the post and the events which followed’.

In her written case against Rooney, Vardy’s lawyers said the abuse she received made her ‘feel suicidal’, adding: ‘She suffered from severe panic attacks and anxiety which manifested in being scared to leave her house.’

Vardy went on to also claim her husband Jamie was targeted during football matches, with opposition fans chanting ‘your wife is a grass’ for up to five minutes at a time.

The hearing before Mrs Justice Steyn continues.

Got a story?

If you’ve got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the Metro.co.uk entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@metro.co.uk, calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we’d love to hear from you.

Source: Read Full Article